Nandini satpathy case summary
WitrynaNandini Satpathy vs Dani (P.L.) And Anr on 7 April, 1978. ... 20(3), unlike Section 161, did not operate at the anterior stages before the case came to court and the accused's incriminating utterance, previously recorded, was attempted to be introduced. He relied on some passages in American decisions but, in our understanding, those passages ...
Nandini satpathy case summary
Did you know?
Witryna14 maj 1992 · A perusal of the facts in Nandini Satpathy v. Dani, (Supra) would clearly indicate that the decision has no application in the present cases. The matter arose out of a complaint filed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police (Vigilance) against the appellant under section 179 of the Indian Penal Code before the Sub Divisional … WitrynaNandini Satpathy, a former Chief Minister of Orissa and one time minister at the national level was directed to appear at the Vigilance, Police Station, Cuttack, in September …
WitrynaPreventing the accused against self-incrimination during investigation. Case: Nandini Satpathy v. P. L. Dani In Supreme Court of India: 1978 AIR 1025, 1978 SCR (3) 608 … WitrynaNandini Satpathy case. Nandini Satpathy, the former Chief Minister of Orissa, was directed to appear at the Vigilance Police Station, Cuttack, in connection with a vigilance case against her. Nandini Satpathy was given a long list of questions in writing about her alleged acquisition of assets disproportionate to her known sources of income.
Witryna20 maj 2024 · Case title: Nandini Satpathy vs Dani (P.L.) And Anr on 7 April, 1978 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: J. Jaswant Singh, V.D. Tulzapurkar and V.R. Krishna Iyer. Parties: Petitioner: Nandini Satpathy Respondent: DANI (P.L.) AND … WitrynaThis is the thirty fifth video on criminal procedure code in which I have discussed a landmark judgment on protection against self incrimination.Educational ...
WitrynaThe High Court dismissed the revision petition and confirmed the order permitting withdrawal of the case. Mohd. Mumtaz Vs. Nandini Satpathy & Ors [1986] INSC 286 …
WitrynaNANDINI SATPATHY Vs. RESPONDENT: DANI (P.L.) AND ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT07/04/1978 BENCH: KRISHNAIYER, V.R. BENCH: KRISHNAIYER, V.R. … first step of sarasota incWitryna15 maj 2024 · Case Summary; Nandini Satpathy vs. P. L. Dani and Ors. By. Chinnamma K.C. - May 15, 2024. In the Supreme Court of India Equivalent Citation AIR 1978 SC 1025 Appellants Nandini Satpathy … first step of sarasota jobsWitrynaThe case named Tukaram & Anr. v State of Maharashtra [1] was a landmark case as far as rape and its laws are concerned. The incident took place in 1972, Chandrapur district of Maharashtra which shook the nation. ... Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani and Anr., (1978) 2 SCC 424 [9] Section 160(1) od Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (act 2 of … first step of sarasota 34234Witryna24 kwi 2024 · JUDGMENT: NANDINI SATPATHY V. P. L. DANI AND ANR. The Court held that for invoking Art. 20 (3), the party pleading must be accused of an offence, … campbell university work orderWitryna14 maj 1992 · Nandini Satpathy 1987 1 SCC 269 and 1987 1 SCC...279 had already been referred to a bench of five Judges, the learned Judge directed that the present … campbell v acuff rose oyezWitrynaThe Supreme Court in Nandini Satpathy vs P.L. Dani[27], held the accused person may remain silent or refuse to answer when confronted with incriminating questions. The ban on self-accusation while investigation or trial is under way goes beyond that case and protects the accused in regard to other offences pending or imminent. campbell university wsocWitryna20 paź 2024 · A case for abjuring custodial interrogation ... Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer said in Nandini Satpathy vs. P.L. Dani, “Article 20(3) is a human article, a guarantee of dignity and integrity and of ... campbell valley park address