2024 Can a paper be rejected after minor revision

Can a paper be rejected after minor revision

Author: ufgc

August undefined, 2024

WebOne reviewer recommended a minor revision with detailed feedback. ... shallow review with no valuable feedback and rejected the paper. This is how the third reviewer's review goes as follows ... WebApr 9, 2024 · Accept with minor revisions ... If the decision involves revision for the author, the specific changes that are required should be clearly stated in the decision letter and review reports. ... Studies indicate that 21% of papers are rejected without review, and approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review. If your paper has been ...

Journal Said “Major Revisions” Needed? Here’s What to Do

WebResponse: A minor revision often implies that there are a limited number of changes that are needed to improve the manuscript for publication. Depending on the extent of the … Web1. No, minor revision doesn't mean accepted with minor revisions. Strictly speaking, for truly minor revisions, it's possible that the editor accepts your paper and leaves you to … ground passenger transportation services

Decision types on journal articles - Publishing Support

WebJan 9, 2024 · APESM rejects between 35 and 40% of submitted manuscripts without sending them to reviewers, some because their subject matter is outside of the scope of APESM. Another 30% or so are rejected after review . The authors of rejected manuscripts are provided with the reasons and I think it instructive to summarise and … Web5. After saving the CAD files to PDF format, ensure that no ‘comments’ or ‘editable content’ exists in the file (embedded hyperlinks are acceptable. ) 6. Paper plans scanned to PDF format are acceptable, but should be clearly legible and follow the same rules above. 7. Ensure the file name meets the naming recommendations noted above. WebAnd you can still be rejected after major revisions; therefore, you need to take particular care. ... Minor revisions and major revisions are the two most common editorial decisions after peer review. A decision of minor revisions means your work will likely not be going back to the original peer reviewers for another round of comments. This is ... fill up billups pass christian

What is the meaning of the Under Review status for a minor revision ...

Eight reasons I rejected your article - Elsevier Connect

WebSep 12, 2012 · 6. It's simply a small extension of a different paper, often from the same authors. Findings are incremental and do not advance the field. The work is clearly part of a larger study, chopped up to make as many articles as possible. 7. It's incomprehensible. The language, structure, or figures are so poor that the merit can't be assessed. WebTo "review" Revision literally means "to see again," which is to examine things from a new, critical perspective. It is a continual process of examining your arguments, assessing your evidence, clarifying your aim, restructuring your presentation, and rejuvenating stale writing. The first draft is not final; you can always revise it later. fill up boost gaugeWebSep 23, 2015 · Is it common for a journal to reject a paper after previously accepting it? When a paper of mine was first reviewed, one of the reviewers was okay with the paper and the other one requested minor revisions. The journal clearly said that the paper was … Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack … ground path inductance sensitivity

"WebIn contrast, papers receiving at least one recommendation of reject (“the kiss of death”) were almost always rejected; in fact receiving even one reviewer recommendation of reject … " - Can a paper be rejected after minor revision

Can a paper be rejected after minor revision

Is it possible to get major revision after minor revision?

WebApr 12, 2024 · Acknowledge the receipt. The first thing you should do after submitting your revised paper is to acknowledge the receipt of your submission by the journal. This is a simple but courteous gesture ... WebMay 29, 2024 · No, minor revision doesn't mean accepted with minor revisions. Strictly speaking, for truly minor revisions, it's possible that the editor accepts your paper and …

Did you know?

WebSep 7, 2024 · I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 … WebMar 9, 2024 · Situation 1: Accept with Minor Revision. Example, “The paper is well written, presents new matter, and can be published with minor revisions: ... We hope the articles …

WebApr 5, 2024 · Why has my paper been rejected? You can find feedback on the submission system, SuSy. It should be attached to the manuscript. Manuscripts are rejected for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to: ... After submitting the minor revision, the statutes changed to the pending editorial decision for 1 month. All of the sudden the … WebDec 19, 2024 · 1 Answer to this question. Answer: Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper ...

WebAug 22, 2024 · For journals I have managed, the number of “major revision” papers that are eventually accepted stays solidly between 80-90%. When editors, reviewers, and authors have put time into critiquing and improving a paper, it just seems downright unfair to reject the paper. But, there can be a resignation to accept an okay paper at this point too.

WebAfter extensive editing, the work may be rejected. When you submit your article after significant modification, it is allocated to the same reviewers to expedite the process. If …

WebApr 9, 2024 · Accept with minor revisions ... If the decision involves revision for the author, the specific changes that are required should be clearly stated in the decision letter and … fill up bottleWebMay 30, 2024 · The reasons for a paper being rejected once it has been reviewed fall mainly into two categories: (1) problems with the research; and (2) problems with the writing/presentation of the paper. A paper may be rejected because of problems with the research on which it is based. fill up cit 8WebEven the best papers could sometimes receive a major revision or rejection after an initial minor revision request. It all depends on the editor to adjudge the comments base on the merit of the paper. fill up carthageWebMay 7, 2024 · It took almost 8 months.According to the reviewer, the paper did not contain the right message and needed a significant overhaul to be published. I fully respect the … ground path inductanceWebMar 9, 2024 · Situation 1: Accept with Minor Revision. Example, “The paper is well written, presents new matter, and can be published with minor revisions: ... We hope the articles in this series have better prepared you for dealing with journal revision or rejection. Common Manuscript Errors. Rate this article. Cancel Reply. You must be logged in to post ... ground pathWebJul 1, 2024 · Similarly, getting rejected is never an indication of poor quality of the manuscript. Another lesson is, never give up; keep on trying, until you get your manuscript published. All the best. ground path翻译WebAt the 1st review, the referees' have written positive statement. One of the referee suggested minor revision, while the other suggested major revision. I have revised the paper according to the referees' comments. Recently. I have received minor comments (only a few text corrections) from the referee who suggested major revision at the 1st … fill up bowl kfc